When you're outfitting a desk for business phone conversations, the Poly Edge E450 corded IP phone is a practical choice. But two listings are vying for the same spot on your desk: one carries the part number 2201-87030-001, and the other gets straight to the point with Wi-Fi & Bluetooth in its name. The decision comes down to whether you want the listing that explicitly calls out wireless connectivity or the one that's anchored to a specific SKU.
Quick verdict
Both listings offer the same Poly Edge E450 model with 14 lines, amplified sound, HD Voice, Bluetooth connectivity, and USB-C interface. The main differences are the listed price and how each title frames the product. The Wi-Fi & Bluetooth listing is the more affordable of the two at USD 105.99, while the 2201-87030-001 listing is priced at USD 109.95. If connecting over Wi-Fi is a feature you want called out right in the product title, the lower-priced listing is the one to pick. If you prefer a listing that leads with the exact part number and you're comfortable with a slightly higher listed price, the SKU-specific listing makes sense.
Listed price comparison
| Listing | Listed price | Price bar | Feature highlight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poly Edge E450 - 2201-87030-001 | USD 109.95 | Model-number-specific title | |
| Poly Edge E450 with Wi-Fi & Bluetooth | USD 105.99 | Wi-Fi & Bluetooth in title |
The spread is about USD 3.96, so the choice barely moves the budget needle. What changes is the emphasis in the title and the exact listing you're ordering from.
Where each listing wins
The 2201-87030-001 listing is the pick if you like seeing a full part number up front. It's listed at USD 109.95, and its description highlights amplified sound, HD voice, Bluetooth, and USB-C, alongside the headset jack and wall-mountable design. The condition is listed as used, and a California Prop 65 warning is included.
The Wi-Fi & Bluetooth listing is the pick if you want the title to spell out Wi-Fi and Bluetooth capabilities directly. It comes in at USD 105.99, and its description adds color with Poly HD Voice technology, NoiseBlockAI, and a bass-enhancing speaker design. It's also a used unit with a California Prop 65 warning.
Product notes
Poly Edge E450 Corded IP Phone VoIP Business Phone - 2201-87030-001
This listing is built around the specific part number 2201-87030-001, which makes it easy to identify if you're matching against a purchase order or an existing inventory system. The listed price is USD 109.95, and the description emphasizes the amplified sound, HD voice, headset jack, and Bluetooth connectivity that the Edge E450 brings to a business desk. The interface options include Ethernet (RJ-45), USB-C, and RJ-9, so you have wired connectivity choices. One limitation to keep in mind: the title doesn't mention Wi-Fi, even though the model may share the same general feature set as the other listing. If Wi-Fi in the product name matters to you, you'll want to look at the other listing instead.
Poly Edge E450 Corded IP Phone VoIP Business Phone with Wi-Fi & Bluetooth
This listing leads with Wi-Fi & Bluetooth right in the title, so you know exactly what connectivity options are being highlighted. It's the lower-priced of the two at USD 105.99, about USD 3.96 less than the 2201-87030-001 listing. The description goes a bit deeper on audio, mentioning Poly HD Voice technology, a bass-enhancing speaker design, and Poly NoiseBlockAI for background noise reduction. It also includes a GTIN, which can be useful for cataloging. The limitation here is that the title doesn't carry a specific suffix like 2201-87030-001, so if you need to match an exact SKU, the other listing is the one to choose.
Final choice by use case
If you want the lower listed price and a title that explicitly includes Wi-Fi & Bluetooth, go with the USD 105.99 listing. If you'd rather have the part number 2201-87030-001 in the title and you're okay with a listed price of USD 109.95, the SKU-specific listing is the one. The roughly USD 4.00 gap is small enough that your preference for title wording or part-number specificity should be the deciding factor.
